Method

How a motion gets decided here

Four steps, in order. Each one is visible on the case file, so you can see what the prediction was built from.

  1. 01

    The record

    A search assembles a working case profile — court, parties, claims, posture — from public information. Every field is provisional until the briefing confirms it, and the file shows how it was compiled.

  2. 02

    The briefing

    Motion, opposition, reply, and anything else on the question. Upload the PDFs or paste the text. The text is what the analysis reads; nothing is inferred about documents that were not supplied.

  3. 03

    The prediction

    The briefing is read against the governing standard for that motion type. The result is a probable outcome, a confidence figure, the drivers behind it, and the facts most likely to flip it.

  4. 04

    The room

    Readers vote grant or deny and argue it out in the comments. The community call sits beside the machine's call — they disagree often, and that disagreement is the useful part.

What this is not

Not legal advice, not a prediction of what any particular judge will do, and not a substitute for reading the record. Treat a prediction the way you would treat a colleague's quick read in the hallway: useful, opinionated, and no more than that.

Search for a case